nof1l.gif (4731 bytes)

Formula 1 Diecast
F1 Diecast

Formula 1 news, results and statistics when you need it

Michelin and BMW ?  
6 August 2001 Volume 3 - Issue 25  

blank.gif (809 bytes)
blank.gif (809 bytes)
Main Page
Formula 1 News
2013 F1 Schedule
2013 F1 Line-up
2014 F1 Schedule
F1 Teams
F1 Drivers
NewsOnF1 Mobile
10 'n' Pole
Register - Submit
F1 Regulations
The Forums
Live F1 Coverage
Motorsport Shop
UK - USA
Motorsport Calendar

F1 Merchandise UK
F1 Merchandise USA

F1 Tours
F1 Tickets
F1 Diecast
F1 Videos
F1 Games
F1 Trivia
NewsOnF1 on Twitter
MotoGP Tickets

Past Formula 1 Seasons
2012 F1 Results
2011 F1 Results
2010 F1 Results

2009 F1 Results
2008 F1 Results
2007 F1 Results
2006 F1 Results
2005 F1 Results
2004 F1 Results
2003 F1 Results

2002 F1 Results

2001 F1 Results

2000 F1 Results

1999 F1 Results

1998 F1 Results

1997 F1 Results

Links
Translate
2010 World Cup
Search
Contact Us
About
Archives
Your Say
Diagnosis & Prognosis
By the Heretic
Controversy Corner
The Real Race
By the Quali-flyer
F1 Testing
F1 Team Reports
8 'n' Pole
2006 World Cup

Download the NewsOnF1.com
toolbar
powered by Alexa

We expected Williams to do well in Hockenheim and they certainly did. We know that Williams have a power advantage over the other two leading teams and it certainly showed.

Reliability may still be a problem for Williams. I do not agree with Ralf's observation that he was expecting Montoya's car to fail because it was being driven too hard. It is safe to assume that all cars have engine management controls, which are set before race starts. Montoya's car may have been limited to higher revolutions than Ralf's and that may explain why Montoya was faster. It would also explain his engine failure, which looked like a mechanical failure in the right bank - typical of consistent high revs. If that was the case it is a decision made by the team and Montoya's only fault was to drive to the limit (which is what he is paid to do).

Now if Ralf had said that he expected Montoya's tyres to go off, it would have been a different matter. But then he was not close enough to take advantage of that.

Montoya is fast and has adapted to the car. He certainly is fast enough to challenge Ralf. He does drive on the limit and seems more likely to break things than Ralf. But if it were I, Ralf, I would take notice. Soon he will be hard to beat.

Track conditions and temperature suited Michelin. It is hard to determine the extent to which the Michelin tyres contributed to William's success. I suspect that it was considerable as four of the six cars that finished in the points were on Michelin tyres.

Williams can safely assume that temperatures will be relatively high for the rest of the season and, with the exception of Hungary, the rest of the circuits are fast. Cold weather and rain seem to be the only factors that will stop them from being dominant (give or take a few engine failures, which are likely).

There is a lot of controversy over the decision to restart the race. Most of the objectors felt that it was a poorly disguised attempt to get Michael Schumacher back into the race. Villeneuve stated that he was surprised as the start is by far the most dangerous part of the race and it would have been safer to clear the debris with the pace car out.

Burti, Bernoldi and Schumacher's cars left an enormous amount of shrapnel on the track. It is possible that this could have been cleaned while the cars are lapping safely behind the pace car and if none of the cars picked up any of the razor sharp slivers of carbon fibre, the race could have continued.

Although I do not doubt that giving Michael Schumacher a second chance would have been seen as a side benefit, I cannot believe that the decision was made on any grounds other than safety.

Although we often assume that these decisions are made only to maximise the safety of the drivers, it is not true. The safety of drivers, pit crew, marshals and spectators must be, and is, considered before any of these decisions are made.

In this particular case, the Race Director had to make a snap judgement. He did not have much time as a full restart of a race is only allowed if less than two laps are completed. There was a lot of debris lying around. Several laps behind the pace car would definitely have given some of the fleet a slow puncture (if not a fast one) - that in itself is a dangerous situation. With 20-20 hindsight it is easy to criticise.

He made the call. I believe it was the right one at the time. I do not believe that it was made to give Michael another chance, or to please the crowd.


Interesting that both Ferraris that Michael drove failed, although for different reasons.

Ferrari, like all teams, are probably pushing the limits of their car in an attempt to match the straight line speed of the Williams. Under those circumstances one must expect some failures but two out of three cars seem a bit ominous.

It certainly seems as if McLaren do not have the pace to run with Ferrari. Barrichello may have managed to slip past both McLarens on a lighter fuel load before his first pit stop but when he overtook Coulthard the second time he was actually heavier than the McLaren. Hungary seems to be their only remaining hope of finishing on the podium.

Villeneuve drove a perfect race to finish in third place. Given a good car he still has the ability to perform.

Barrichello impressed me with his consistent performance too. He may not have had the pace to take the Williams cars on but they were not getting away from him. Unfortunately he could only do this because of the two-stop strategy he adopted and after the long pit stop when the fuelling hose failed; his chances of challenging (albeit ever so slim) were gone.

I am amazed that the organisers are still prepared to accept defective fuelling hoses (or couplings). These are supplied by an independent organisation and although the teams are allowed to check and clean the hoses before the race they are not allowed to fiddle with them too much.

I can understand the logic of outsourcing this to an independent company, as flow control would then be regulated. What I cannot understand is why two failed (Montoya and Barrichello). In Barrichello's case it did not affect the outcome of the race but it is possible that Montoya's car overheated while waiting for the pit crew to swap hoses, and this lead to his ultimate retirement.

Over the season we have seen several drivers being disadvantaged during refuelling for reasons beyond the control of the teams. Why are we accepting this? Surely it is not that hard to fix?

Previous Heretic Issues
The Heretic's Season Preview

Agree or disagree ?
Please submit any comments you have on this commentary below

Your comments and the Heretic's reply could be published on NewsOnF1.

Name:
Email address:
Country:

Comments:

 

Back to Top


We Recommend

F1 Tickets
Spanish F1 GP
Canadian F1 GP
British F1 GP
European F1 GP (Valencia)
Belgian F1 GP
Italian F1 GP
United States F1 GP
Abu Dhabi F1 GP
VIP F1 Paddock Club Tickets
MotoGP Tickets
Netherlands MotoGP
Catalunya MotoGP
Portuguese MotoGP
Valencia MotoGP
MotoGP VIP Village Tickets
more Motorsport Tours & Holidays
Australian F1 Grand Prix Tour package
Clipsal 500 Adelaide package
 

F1 Merchandise

The Complete Book of Formula One: All Cars and Drivers Since 1950

Official 2004 F1 Season Review

Autocourse 2004 Annual

F1 World Championship Yearbook 2004

The Science of
F1 Design

The Official Tribute To Ayrton Senna
1960 To 1994

Formula 1 Books

Race Driving Books

Race Car Design Books


Ayrton Senna

Past Formula 1 Drivers